4.3 Article

A two-stage method for member selection of emergency medical service

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 871-891

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10878-015-9856-z

关键词

Emergency medical service (EMS); Member selection; Multi-objective programming; Non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71101114, 71473188, 71401131, 71403158, 61374068]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M511979]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [BDY251412]
  4. Science and Technology Development Fund, MSAR [066/2013/A2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Member selection is an important decision making problem in the formation of emergency medical teams. It involves selecting an optimal combination from a reasonable number of doctors, nurses and emergency medical technicians. Selecting suitable members for a medical emergency team (MET) will facilitate the effectiveness of emergency medical service (EMS). Essentially, investigations on EMS could offer models which increase the efficiency of proper matching and earn time to save lives. The existing methods for member selection pay much attention to the individual information to measure the individual performance of members, while few studies focus on the collaborative information to measure the collaborative performance between members. This paper aims to propose a two-stage method for member selection of an MET. In the first stage, knowledge rules are proposed to identify the valid candidates quickly. In the second stage, the individual information of members, the collaborative information between members, and the response time of EMS are all considered to build a three-objective 0-1 programming model. Due to its intractability, the model is solved by a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II. Liberia, now suffering the Ebola virus, is used as a backdrop for this study. A practical example followed by a computational simulation experiment is used to illustrate the applicability and the effectiveness of the proposed method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据