4.2 Article

Immunohistochemical actinin-4 expression in infiltrating gliomas: association with WHO grade and differentiation

期刊

BRAIN TUMOR PATHOLOGY
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 11-16

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10014-013-0139-z

关键词

Actinin-4; Immunohistochemistry; Infiltrating glioma; WHO grade; Differentiation

资金

  1. National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund [23-A-11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Actinin-4 is an isoform of nonmuscular alpha-actinin and actin-bundling protein that plays an important role in cancer invasion and metastasis by enhancing cellular motility. Recent studies have revealed an association between several clinicopathological profiles and actinin-4 overexpression in human cancers. In this study, we investigated the immunohistochemical actinin-4 expression in 39 infiltrating gliomas. The specimens included three diffuse astrocytomas, three oligodendrogliomas, one oligoastrocytoma, two anaplastic astrocytomas, four anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, three anaplastic oligoastrocytomas, 17 glioblastomas, four gliosarcomas, and two glioblastomas with oligodendroglial component. All seven World Health Organization (WHO) grade II tumors were negative for actinin-4, whereas 20 of 22 tumors with strong actinin-4 expression were WHO grade IV. Actinin-4 expression was significantly associated with histological grade (P < 0.0001) and proliferative activity measured by Ki-67 staining (P = 0.0045). Notably, actinin-4 expression was more pronounced in high-grade astrocytic tumors than oligodendroglial tumors (P < 0.0001). Additionally, pseudopalisading cells in glioblastoma exhibited stronger actinin-4 expression than the rest, likely reflecting enhanced cellular motility in pseudopalisades. This study is the first to demonstrate significant correlation between actinin-4 expression and tumor grade using clinical glioma samples. Although diagnostic utility of this marker awaits future exploration, actinin-4 may help distinguish between astrocytic and oligodendroglial lines of differentiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据