4.6 Article

Common and specific brain responses to scenic emotional stimuli

期刊

BRAIN STRUCTURE & FUNCTION
卷 219, 期 4, 页码 1463-1472

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-013-0580-0

关键词

Amygdala; Anterior cingulate gyrus; Emotion; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Fusiform gyrus

资金

  1. Centro de Investigacion Biomedica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM)
  2. Catalonian Government [2009SGR211]
  3. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [CM11/00024]
  4. Miguel Servet research contracts [CP07/00048, CP10/00596]
  5. [10/231]
  6. [PI10/01058]
  7. [PI05/1874]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Processing of emotions has been an enduring topic of interest in neuroimaging research, but studies have mostly used facial emotional stimuli. The aim of this study was to determine neural networks involved in emotion processing using scenic emotional visual stimuli. One hundred and twenty photographs from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS), including ecological scenes of disgust, fear, happiness, and sadness, were presented to 40 healthy participants while they underwent functional magnetic imaging resonance (fMRI). Afterwards they evaluated the emotional content of the pictures in an offline task. The occipito-temporal cortex and the amygdala-hippocampal complex showed a non-specific emotion-related activation, which was more marked in response to negative emotions than to happiness. The temporo-parietal cortex and the ventral anterior cingulate gyrus showed deactivation, with the former being marked for all emotions except fear and the latter being most marked for disgust. The fusiform gyrus showed activation in response to disgust and deactivation in response to happiness or sadness. Brain regions involved in processing of scenic emotion therefore resemble those reported for facial expressions of emotion in that they respond to a range of different emotions, although there appears to be specificity in the intensity and direction of the response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据