4.6 Article

Cytoarchitecture of the mouse neocortex revealed by the low-molecular-weight neurofilament protein subunit

期刊

BRAIN STRUCTURE & FUNCTION
卷 216, 期 3, 页码 183-199

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-011-0311-3

关键词

Immunocytochemistry; Cytoarchitecture; Mouse; Myelin; Cortical mapping

资金

  1. Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders, Belgium (FWO-Flanders)
  2. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium [OT 09/22]
  3. James S. McDonnell Foundation [22002078]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The expression patterns of the medium- and high-molecular-weight subunits of the neurofilament protein triplet have been extensively studied in several neuroanatomical studies. In the present study, we report the use of the low-molecular-weight neurofilament protein subunit (NF-L) as a reliable marker within the neurofilament protein family to reveal the regional architecture of mammalian neocortex. We document clearly its usefulness in anatomical parcellation studies and report unique expression patterns of NF-L throughout the mouse neocortex. NF-L was most abundant in the somatosensory cortex, the lateral secondary visual area, the granular insular cortex, and the motor cortex. Low NF-L staining intensity was observed in the agranular insular cortex, the prelimbic and infralimbic cortex, the anterior cingulate cortex, the visual rostromedial areas, the temporal association cortex, the ectorhinal cortex, and the lateral entorhinal cortex. NF-L immunoreactivity was present in the perikarya, dendrites, and proximal segment of axons primarily of pyramidal neurons, and was mainly located in layers II and III, and to a lesser extent in layers V and VI. Interestingly, Black-Gold myelin staining confirmed a close correlation between NF-L immunoreactivity and myelination patterns. The characteristic and distinctive distribution and laminar expression profiles of NF-L make it an excellent tool to assess accurately topographical boundaries among neocortical areas as illustrated herein in the adult mouse brain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据