4.6 Article

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy Randomized to Different Amounts of Electrical Charge for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Acute and Chronic Effects

期刊

BRAIN STIMULATION
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 631-640

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.09.013

关键词

Dose response; Treatment durability; Treatment-resistant depression; VNS efficacy; Vagus nerve stimulation

资金

  1. Cyberonics
  2. Neuronetics
  3. Eli Lilly
  4. Genomind
  5. Sunovion
  6. AstraZeneca
  7. Dalio Family Foundation
  8. Abbott
  9. Takeda-Lundbeck
  10. Helicon
  11. Johnson Johnson
  12. NIMH
  13. Medtronic
  14. NeoSync
  15. K08 NIMH Mentored Clinical Scientist Award
  16. NARSAD Young Investigator Award
  17. Sidney Baer Foundation
  18. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  19. Merck
  20. Pfizer
  21. GSK
  22. Otsuka
  23. Novartis
  24. Brainsway
  25. ANS/St. Jude and NeoSync
  26. Teva (Cephalon)
  27. PamLab
  28. Mylan (Dey)
  29. Cervel
  30. Wyeth
  31. Jazz
  32. DOD
  33. NIH/NIMH
  34. NIDA
  35. NINDS
  36. NIA
  37. NARSAD
  38. Stanley Foundation
  39. St. Jude Medical
  40. MagStim
  41. Forest
  42. Shire
  43. Janssen/Johnson
  44. Johnson
  45. GlaxoSmithKline
  46. Somerset
  47. SmithKline Beecham
  48. Lilly Research Foundation
  49. Organon
  50. Janssen Research Foundation
  51. Wyeth-Ayerst
  52. Parke-Davis
  53. Merck Research
  54. Broaden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Major depressive disorder is a prevalent, disabling, and often chronic or recurrent psychiatric condition. About 35% of patients fail to respond to conventional treatment approaches and are considered to have treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Objective: We compared the safety and effectiveness of different stimulation levels of adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy for the treatment of TRD. Methods: In a multicenter, double blind study, 331 patients with TRD were randomized to one of three dose groups: LOW (0.25 mA current, 130 mu s pulse width), MEDIUM (0.5-1.0 mA, 250 mu s), or HIGH (1.25-1.5 mA, 250 mu s). A highly treatment-resistant population (>97% had failed to respond to >= 6 previous treatments) was enrolled. Response and adverse effects were assessed for 22 weeks (end of acute phase), after which output current could be increased, if clinically warranted. Assessments then continued until Week 50 (end of long-term phase). Results: VNS therapy was well tolerated. During the acute phase, all groups showed statistically significant improvement on the primary efficacy endpoint (change in Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Clinician Administered Version [IDS-C]), but not for any between-treatment group comparisons. In the long-term phase, mean change in IDS-C scores showed continued improvement. Post-hoc analyses demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between total charge delivered per day and decreasing depressive symptoms; and analysis of acute phase responders demonstrated significantly greater durability of response at MEDIUM and HIGH doses than at the LOW dose. Conclusions: TRD patients who received adjunctive VNS showed significant improvement at study endpoint compared with baseline, and the effect was durable over 1 year. Higher electrical dose parameters were associated with response durability. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据