4.6 Article

A case of refractory orofacial pain treated by transcranial direct current stimulation applied over hand motor area in combination with NMDA agonist drug intake

期刊

BRAIN STIMULATION
卷 4, 期 2, 页码 117-121

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2010.09.003

关键词

facial pain; motor cortex; NMDA-receptor; tDCS

资金

  1. German Ministry of Research and Education within the Kompetenznetz Schmerz [FKZ: 01EM0117]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background A female patient presented with persistent orofacial pain on the right side for 3 years, attributed to a viral infection. The pain had remained largely pharmacoresistant, reaching a value of 8/10 on the visual analogue scale. Methods The patient underwent varying three different conditions of trancranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). First, the contralateral representational field of the face area of the primary motor cortex (M1) was anodally stimulated for 5 consecutive days for 20 minutes at 1 mA. During the second stimulation condition, 20 minutes cathodal stimulation was applied for 5 consecutive days at 2 mA intensity over the contralateral representational field the face area of primary somatosensory cortex (SI). In the third condition, the hand area of the left M1 was anodally stimulated for 20 minutes at I mA intensity for 8 days combined with the oral administration of D-cycloserine. Results With regard the third stimulation condition, a 60% reduction in pain perception was observed toward the end of the stimulation. The patient reported a significant pain relief sensation for up to 6 weeks poststimulation. Conclusions Although this is a pilot exploratory trial in a single patient, our study is a further step toward clinical application of tDCS over the M1 using pharmacologic intervention, to prolong the induced after effect. Furthermore, it demonstrates the potential for repetitive daily stimulation therapy for chronic pain patients. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据