4.0 Review

Where the thoughts dwell: The physiology of neuronal-glial diffuse neural net

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS
卷 66, 期 1-2, 页码 133-151

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.05.002

关键词

Human brain; Glia; Neurone; History; Evolution of glia; Cognition; Neuronal-glial network; Homeostasis; Neuropathology

资金

  1. Alzheimer's Research Trust (UK) [ART/PG2004A/1]
  2. National Institute of Health (NIH) [R01 MH 069791]
  3. National Science Foundation [CBET 0943343]
  4. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [GACR 309/09/1696, GACR 305/08/1381, GACR 305/08/1384]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanisms underlying the production of thoughts by exceedingly complex cellular networks that construct the human brain constitute the most challenging problem of natural sciences. Our understanding of the brain function is very much shaped by the neuronal doctrine that assumes that neuronal networks represent the only substrate for cognition. These neuronal networks however are embedded into much larger and probably more complex network formed by neuroglia. The latter, although being electrically silent, employ many different mechanisms for intercellular signalling. It appears that astrocytes can control synaptic networks and in such a capacity they may represent an integral component of the computational power of the brain rather than being just brain connective tissue. The fundamental question of whether neuroglia is involved in cognition and information processing remains, however, open. Indeed, a remarkable increase in the number of glial cells that distinguishes the human brain can be simply a result of exceedingly high specialisation of the neuronal networks, which delegated all matters of survival and maintenance to the neuroglia. At the same time potential power of analogue processing offered by internally connected glial networks may represent the alternative mechanism involved in cognition. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据