4.0 Review

New advances in musculoskeletal pain

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS
卷 60, 期 1, 页码 187-201

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.012

关键词

Bone healing; Osteoarthritis; Osteoporosis; Post-surgical pain; Fracture

资金

  1. BBSRC
  2. BPS
  3. HEFCE
  4. KTN
  5. MRC
  6. Arthritis Research Campaign
  7. National institutes of Health [NS23970, NS048021]
  8. Veteran's Administration Merit Review
  9. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E527098/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. BBSRC [BB/E527098/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-malignant musculoskeletal pain is the most common clinical symptom that causes patients to seek medical attention and is a major cause of disability in the world. Musculoskeletal pain can arise from a variety of common conditions including osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, surgery, low back pain and bone fracture. A major problem in designing new therapies to treat musculoskeletal pain is that the underlying mechanisms driving musculoskeletal pain are not well understood. This lack of knowledge is largely due to the scarcity of animal models that closely mirror the human condition which would allow the development of a mechanistic understanding and novel therapies to treat this pain. To begin to develop a mechanism-based understanding of the factors involved in generating musculoskeletal pain, in this review we present recent advances in preclinical models of osteoarthritis, post-surgical pain and bone fracture pain. The models discussed appear to offer an attractive platform for understanding the factors that drive this pain and the preclinical screening of novel therapies to treat musculoskeletal pain. Developing both an understanding of the mechanisms that drive persistent musculoskeletal pain and novel mechanism-based therapies to treat these unique pain states would address a major unmet clinical need and have significant clinical, economic and societal benefits. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据