4.0 Review

Neurobiological mechanisms of the reinstatement of drug-conditioned place preference

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH REVIEWS
卷 59, 期 2, 页码 253-277

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.08.002

关键词

Conditioned place preference; Reinstatement; Drug priming; Stress; Drug addiction

资金

  1. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (FIS)
  3. RETICS
  4. Red de Trastornos Adictivos [RD06/001/0016]
  5. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia
  6. Direccion General de Investigacion
  7. FEDER [SEJ2005-00316/PSIC]
  8. Generalitat Valenciana, Agencia Valenciana de Salud, Direccion General de Drogodependencias (FEPAD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drug addiction is a chronic disorder characterized by a high rate of relapse following detoxification. There are two main versions of the reinstatement model that are employed to study relapse to drug abuse; one based on the operant self-administration procedure, and the other on the classical conditioned place preference procedure. In the last seven years, the use of the latter version has become more widespread, and the results obtained complement those obtained in self-administration studies. It has been observed that the conditioned place preference induced by opioids, psychostimulants, nicotine, ethanol and other drugs of abuse can be extinguished and reinstated by drug priming or exposure to stressful events. Herein, the neuroanatomical and neurochemical basis of drug priming and stress-induced reinstatement of morphine and cocaine, together with the molecular correlates of reinstatement behavior, are reviewed. Differences between the conditioned place preference and self-administration studies are also discussed. Evidence suggests that data of reinstatement with the CPP are to be viewed with caution until more extensive analysis of operant procedures has been performed, and that further research will undoubtedly improve our understanding of the neurobiological mechanisms of relapse to drug seeking. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据