4.7 Article

A novel benzimidazole-functionalized 2-D COF material: Synthesis and application as a selective solid-phase extractant for separation of uranium

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 437, 期 -, 页码 211-218

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.09.046

关键词

Covalent organic frameworks (COFs); Modified; Solid-phase extractant; Uranium; Selective sorption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21171122, 21271132, 91126016, J1210004, J1103315, J1310008]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KJCX2-YW-N50-3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel COF-based material (COF-COOH) containing large amounts of carboxylic groups was prepared for the first time by using a simple and effective one-step synthetic method, in which the cheap and commercially available raw materials, trimesoyl chloride and p-phenylenediamine, were used. The as-synthesized COF-COOH was modified with previously synthesized 2-(2,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-benzimidazole (HBO by grafting to method, and a new solid-phase extractant (COF-HBI) with highly efficient sorption performance for uranium(VI) was consequently obtained. A series of characterizations demonstrated that COF-COOH and COF-HBI exhibited great thermostabilities and irradiation stabilities. Sorption behavior of the COF-based materials toward U(VI) was compared in simulated nuclear industrial effluent containing UO22+ and 11 undesired ions, and the UO22+ sorption amount of COF-HBI was 81 mg g(-1), accounting for approximately 58% of the total sorption amount, which was much higher than the sorption selectivity of COF-COOH to UO22+ (39%). Batch sorption experiment results indicated that the uranium(VI) sorption on COF-HBI was a pH dependent, rapid (sorption equilibrium was reached in 30 min), endothermic and spontaneous process. In the most favorable conditions, the equilibrium sorption capacity of the adsorbent for uranium could reach 211 mg g(-1). (c) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据