4.5 Article

Upregulation of Ryk expression in rat dorsal root ganglia after peripheral nerve injury

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN
卷 77, 期 4, 页码 178-184

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.05.011

关键词

Ryk; Dorsal root ganglia; Sciatic nerve; Lesion; Induction

资金

  1. NSFC (Natural Sciences Foundation of China) [30640006, 30771063]
  2. Beijing Municipal Government [20061DO501800264]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To study changes of Ryk expression in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) after peripheral nerve injury, we set up an animal model of unilateral sciatic nerve lesioned rats. Changes of Ryk protein expression in DRG neurons after unilateral sciatic nerve injury were investigated by immunostaining. Changes of Ryk mRNA were also tested by semi-quantitative PCR concurrently, We found, both at the level of protein and mRNA. that Ryk could be induced in cells of ipsilateral DRG after unilateral sciatic nerve lesion. Further investigation by co-immunostaining confirmed that the Ryk-immunoreactive (Ryk-IR) cells were NeuN-immunoreactive (NeuN-IR) neurons of DRG. We also showed the pattern of Ryk induction in DRG neurons after sciatic nerve injury: the number of Ryk IR neurons peaked at 2 weeks post-lesion and decreased gradually by 3 weeks post-lesion. The proportions of different sized Ryk IR neurons were also observed and counted at various stages after nerve lesion. Analysis of Ryk mRNA by RT-PCR showed the same induction pattern as by immunostaining. Ryk mRNA was not expressed in normal or contralateral DRG, but was expressed 1, 2 and 3 weeks post-lesion in the ipsilateral DRG. Ryk mRNA levels increased slightly from 1 to 2 weeks, decreased then by 3 weeks post-lesion. These results indicate that Ryk might be involved in peripheral nerve plasticity after injury. This is a novel function apart from its well-known fundamental activity as a receptor mediating axon guidance and outgrowth. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据