4.7 Article

Surface silylation of natural mesoporous/macroporous diatomite for adsorption of benzene

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 448, 期 -, 页码 545-552

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.02.067

关键词

Diatomite; Silylation; Phenyltriethoxysilane; Hydrophobicity; Benzene adsorption

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [S2013030014241]
  2. CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams [20140491534]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41202024]
  4. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Naturally occurring porous diatomite (Dt) was functionalized with phenyltriethoxysilane (VMS), and the PTES-modified diatomite (PTES-Dt) was characterized using diffuse reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, nitrogen adsorption, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis. After silylation, a functional group (-C6H5, phenyl) was successfully introduced onto the surface of Dt. PTES-Dt exhibited hydrophobic properties with a water contact angle (WCA) as high as 120 degrees +/- 1 degrees, whereas Dt was superhydrophilic with a WCA of 0 degrees. The benzene adsorption data on both Dt and PTES-Dt fit well with the Langmuir isotherm equation. The Langmuir adsorption capacity of benzene on PTES-Dt is 28.1 mg/g, more than 4-fold greater than that on Dt. Moreover, the adsorption kinetics results show that equilibrium was achieved faster for PTES-Dt than for Dt, over the relative pressure range of 0.118-0.157. The excellent benzene adsorption performance of PTES-Dt is attributed to strong it-system interactions between the phenyl groups and the benzene molecules as well as to the macroporosity of the PTES-Dt. These results show that the silylated diatomite could be a new and inexpensive adsorbent suitable for use in benzene emission control. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据