4.7 Article

The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of stratospheric ozone over the 21st century

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 10, 期 19, 页码 9473-9486

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-9473-2010

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of the Environment of Japan [A-071]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/C003969/1, ncas10009, NE/D002753/1, jwcrp01001] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. NERC [jwcrp01001, NE/D002753/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Future stratospheric ozone concentrations will be determined both by changes in the concentration of ozone depleting substances (ODSs) and by changes in stratospheric and tropospheric climate, including those caused by changes in anthropogenic greenhouse gases (GHGs). Since future economic development pathways and resultant emissions of GHGs are uncertain, anthropogenic climate change could be a significant source of uncertainty for future projections of stratospheric ozone. In this pilot study, using an ensemble of opportunity of chemistry-climate model (CCM) simulations, the contribution of scenario uncertainty from different plausible emissions pathways for ODSs and GHGs to future ozone projections is quantified relative to the contribution from model uncertainty and internal variability of the chemistry-climate system. For both the global, annual mean ozone concentration and for ozone in specific geographical regions, differences between CCMs are the dominant source of uncertainty for the first two-thirds of the 21st century, upto and after the time when ozone concentrations return to 1980 values. In the last third of the 21st century, dependent upon the set of greenhouse gas scenarios used, scenario uncertainty can be the dominant contributor. This result suggests that investment in chemistry-climate modelling is likely to continue to refine projections of stratospheric ozone and estimates of the return of stratospheric ozone concentrations to pre-1980 levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据