4.5 Article

Immunohistochemical study of arginase-1 in the spinal cords of Lewis rats with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1453, 期 -, 页码 77-86

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.023

关键词

Activin A; Arginase-1; Experimental autoimmune; encephalomyelitis; Macrophage; Nitric oxide synthase

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2010-0007585]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0007585] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arginase-1, a marker for M2 phenotype alternatively activated macrophages, inhibits inflammation and is associated with phagocytosis of cell debris and apoptotic cells. We analyzed the expression of arginase-1, a competitive enzyme of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), in the spinal cords of Lewis rats with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). Western blot analysis showed that both arginase-1 and iNOS significantly increased in the spinal cords of rats at the peak stage of EAE compared with the expression level in control animals (p<0.05) and declined thereafter. Immunofluorescent staining demonstrated that increased expression of arginase-1 in EAE spinal cords was confirmed in macrophages as well as in some neurons and astrocytes that were constitutively positive for arginase-1 in normal spinal cords. A semiquantitative analysis by immunofluorescence showed that in EAE lesions, an increased level of arginase-1 immunoreactivity was matched with ED1-positive macrophages, which were also positive for activin A, a marker for the M2 phenotype. Taking all of these findings into consideration, we postulate that the increased level of arginase-1, which is partly from M2 macrophages, contributes to the modulation of neuroinflammation in EAE lesions, possibly through the reduction of nitric oxide in the lesion via competition with iNOS for the use of L-arginine. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据