4.5 Article

NMDA preconditioning prevents object recognition memory impairment and increases brain viability in mice exposed to traumatic brain injury

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1466, 期 -, 页码 82-90

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.041

关键词

NMDA preconditioning; Memory; Cellular viability; Traumatic brain injury

资金

  1. Brazilian National Council Research: CNPq grants [484193/2010-4]
  2. UNESC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have focused on the role of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) in brain injury. The present study is aimed at verifying memory, anxiety/depression parameters, and cellular viability in the brain of mice preconditioned with NMDA and subjected to the model of mild traumatic brain injury. For this purpose, male albino CF-1 mice were pre-treated with NMDA (75 mg/kg) and subjected to brain trauma, and after 24 h submitted to memory tasks and anxiety and depression-like behavioral tests. The memory tests were evaluated at 1.5 h, 24 h, and 7 days after the training. In addition, the cellular viability was evaluated in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus 96 h after the trauma. It was observed that the cellular viability was reduced in the hippocampus of the mice subjected to trauma and the preconditioning with NMDA was able to protect this damage. All mice learnt the task in the habituation test, but in the object recognition task the mice preconditioned with NMDA were protected against impairment induced by TBI in both short and long-term memory. On the other hand, in the step-down inhibitory avoidance test, only the mice treated with NMDA showed impairment of long-term memory (7 days after training session). The evaluation of anxiety/depression behavior showed no changes after TBI. In conclusion, NMDA preconditioning induced impairment of the long-term memory; however, it was able to protect against the novel recognition memory impairment and increase the cellular survival in the hippocampus of mice exposed to traumatic brain injury. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据