4.7 Article

Greenhouse gas relationships in the Indian summer monsoon plume measured by the CARIBIC passenger aircraft

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 3965-3984

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-3965-2010

关键词

-

资金

  1. CARIBIC
  2. Lufthansa
  3. Lufthansa Technik
  4. European Commission [FP6-2005-Global-4-036677]
  5. Max-Planck-Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During the Indian summer monsoon period 2008, regular measurement flights were performed by the CARIBIC aircraft between Germany and India. Measurements included whole air sampling and subsequent analysis for greenhouse gases (CH4, CO2, N2O, SF6) and in-situ measurements of CO, O-3, and H2O. For all these tracers a distinct monsoon signature was observed in the longitude range 50-80 degrees E south of 40 degrees N at flight altitudes 8-12.5 km. The formation of a monsoon plume with enhanced mixing ratios was observed for CH4, N2O, SF6, CO and H2O. The plume began to develop in May and persisted through September, and maximum mixing ratios and maximum spatial extension of the plume were observed in August. For CO2 and O-3 a minimum was observed. The amplitude of the CO2 seasonal cycle was larger than at comparable latitudes outside the monsoon region, and the CO2 spring maximum was observed with a delay of one month. Different tracer relationships show strong spatial variations across the plume. The comparison with NOAA ground station data shows a clear enhancement for CH4, N2O, SF6 and CO and a decrease in CO2 mixing ratios. Assuming seasonally invariant SF6 emissions based on the EDGAR 4.0 inventory, monthly emissions were estimated for the period June-September for CH4, N2O, and CO, and the CO2 uptake was estimated. While for N2O an emission decrease during the monsoon period was derived, emissions of CH4 were highest in September indicating a different seasonal cycle of emissions. Net CO2 uptake by the vegetation was largest in September.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据