4.5 Article

The dorsal striatum expressing adenylyl cyclase-5 controls behavioral sensitivity of the righting reflex to high-dose ethanol

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1489, 期 -, 页码 27-36

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.10.016

关键词

CaMKII alpha; Adenylyl cyclase type 5; BDNF; Dorsal striatum; LORR

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Republic of Korea [2012R1A2A1A03010177]
  2. Ewha Womans University [GT5]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A2A1A03010177] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-dose ethanol inflicts sedation and loss of righting reflex (LORA). Recently, it was reported that AC5 knockout (AC5(-/-)) mice consumed more ethanol and showed reduced sensitivity to high-dose ethanol compared to wild-type mice. As an extension of the previous study, in the present study we examined the signaling mechanism regulating altered behavioral sensitivity of LORR in AC5(-/-) mice. AC5(-/-) mice had enhanced phosphorylation of the NR2B subunit of NMDA receptors in the dorsal striatum and a partial reduction of MK801 (NMDA receptor antagonist)/ethanol-induced LORR. AC5(-/-) mice showed increased levels of phospho-CaMKII alpha, phospho-CREB, and BDNF in the dorsal striatum. CaMKII alpha(+/-) or BDNF+/- mice displayed enhanced LORR, a behavioral phenotype opposite to that displayed by AC5-/- mice. Consistently with these results, stereotaxic infusion of KN62 (CaMKII inhibitor), siRNA-CaMKII alpha, or siRNA-BDNF, within the dorsal striatum was sufficient to prolong LORR. These results suggest that neural mechanism is important for regulating behavioral sensitivity of LORR and that the signaling pathway(s) interplayed by AC5, CaMKII alpha and BDNF within the dorsal striatum is important for regulating the duration of ethanol-induced LORR. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据