4.8 Article

Pattern Recognition of Monosaccharides via a Virtual Lectin Array Constructed by Boronate Affinity-Based pH-Featured Encoding

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 87, 期 8, 页码 4442-4447

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01034

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21425520, 21275073]
  2. Key Grant of 973 Program from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2013CB911202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lectin array is an important tool in the fields of carbohydrate chemistry, glycobiology, and glycomics. Because natural lectins are associated with some apparent disadvantages such as tedious purification and easy loss of activity, artificial materials are applied to overcome such shortages by mimicking and replacing lectins in an artificial lectin :array, among which boronate affinity-based materials are very outstanding and widely used. However, complicated synthetic works are often involved to design and create,boronate affinity-based lectin-mimics. In this work, a facile,and navel method was proposed to establish a. virtual lectin array based on boronate affinity-based pH-featured encoding for discrimination of monosaccharides by pattern recognition. The dependence of boronate affinity on environmental pH was selected to encode each,monosaccharide for feature generation, and the pH-featured encoding was used to construct the virtual lectin array. On the basis, of the virtual array, pattern recognition algorithms were applied for data analysis. Monosaccharides were discriminated by principal component analysis, and the relations in the virtual lectin array were unraveled by,cluster analysis. In this proof-of-concept work, without complicated synthesis or preparation, the proposed method was successful in mimicking lectin array and discriminating nine elementary monosaccharides found in nature, and it was also a new way of encoding in expanding the applications of boronate affinity-based materials and methods in the field of biomimetics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据