4.5 Article

Pristanic acid promotes oxidative stress in brain cortex of young rats: A possible pathophysiological mechanism for brain damage in peroxisomal disorders

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1382, 期 -, 页码 259-265

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.01.014

关键词

Peroxisomal disorders; Pristanic acid; Oxidative stress; Cerebral cortex

资金

  1. CNPq
  2. PRONEX II
  3. FAPERGS
  4. PROPESQ/UFRGS
  5. FINEP
  6. Rede Instituto Brasileiro de Neurociencia (IBN-Net) [01.06.0842-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pristanic acid (Prist) is accumulated in various peroxisomal disorders characterized by severe neurological dysfunction whose pathogenesis is poorly understood. Since oxidative damage has been demonstrated in brain of patients affected by neurodegenerative disorders, in the present work we investigated the in vitro effects of Prist on important parameters of oxidative stress in cerebral cortex from young rats. Prist significantly increased malondialdehyde levels, reflecting an increase of lipid peroxidation. This effect was totally prevented by the free radical scavenger melatonin, suggesting the involvement of reactive species. Prist also provoked protein oxidative damage, as determined by increased carbonyl formation and sulfhydryl oxidation. Otherwise, it did not alter nitric oxide production, indicating that nitrogen reactive species were not implicated in the lipid and oxidative damage provoked by Prist. Furthermore, the concentration of glutathione (GSH), the major brain non-enzymatic antioxidant defense, was significantly decreased by Prist and this decrease was fully prevented by melatonin and attenuated by a-tocopherol. It is therefore presumed that Prist elicits oxidative stress in the brain probably via reactive oxygen species formation and that this pathomechanism may possibly be involved in the brain damage found in patients affected by peroxisomal disorders where Prist accumulates. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据