4.5 Article

Deletion of adenosine A1 or A2A receptors reduces L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine-induced dyskinesia in a model of Parkinson's disease

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1367, 期 -, 页码 310-318

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.099

关键词

Basal ganglia; 6-hydroxydopamine; A(1) and A(2A) knockout; Adenosine receptor antagonist; Preprodynorphin; Preproenkephalin

资金

  1. NIH [NS054978, NS060991]
  2. DoD [W81XWH-04-1-0881]
  3. Michael J. Fox Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonism provides a promising approach to developing nondopaminergic therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). Clinical trials of A(2A) antagonists have targeted PD patients with L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA)-induced dyskinesia (LID) in an effort to improve parkinsonian symptoms. The role of adenosine in the development of LID is little known, especially regarding its actions via A(1) receptors. We aimed to examine the effects of genetic deletion and pharmacological blockade of A(1) and/or A(2A) receptors on the development of LID, on the induction of molecular markers of LID including striatal preprodynorphin and preproenkephalin (PPE), and on the integrity of dopaminergic nigrostriatal neurons in hemipakinsonian mice. Following a unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine lesion A(1), A(2A) and double A(1)-A(2A) knockout (KO) and wild-type littermate mice, and mice pretreated with caffeine (an antagonist of both A(1) and A(2A) receptors) or saline were treated daily for 18-21 days with a low dose of L-DOPA. Total abnormal involuntary movements (AIMs, a measure of LID) were significantly attenuated (p < 0.05) in A(1) and A(2A) KOs, but not in A(1)-A(2A) KOs and caffeine-pretreated mice. An elevation of PPE mRNA ipsilateral to the lesion in WT mice was reduced in all KO mice. In addition, neuronal integrity assessed by striatal dopamine content was similar in all KOs and caffeine-pretreated mice following 6-hydroxydopamine lesioning. Our findings raise the possibility that A(1) or A(2A) receptors blockade might also confer a disease-modifying benefit of reduced risk of disabling LID, whereas the effect of their combined inactivation is less clear. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据