4.5 Article

Exercise-induced plasticity of AMPA-type glutamate receptor subunits in the rat brain

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1363, 期 -, 页码 63-71

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.09.060

关键词

AMPA receptor subunits; Cerebellum; Motor cortex; Physical exercise; Striatum

资金

  1. FAPESP
  2. CNPq (Brazil)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to analyze the plastic effects of moderate exercise upon the motor cortex (M1 and M2 areas), cerebellum (Cb), and striatum (CPu) of the rat brain This assessment was made by verifying the expression of AMPA type glutamate receptor subunits (GluR1 and GluR2/3) We used adult Wistar rats, divided into 5 groups based on duration of exercise training, namely 3 days (EX3), 7 days (EX7) 15 days (EX15) 30 days (EX30), and sedentary (S) The exercised animals were subjected to a treadmill exercise protocol at the speed of the 10 meters/min for 40 mm After exercise, the brains were subjected to immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting to analyze changes of GluR1 and GluR2/3, and plasma cortcosterone was measured by ELISA in order to verify potential stress induced by physical training Overall the results of immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting were similar and revealed that GluR subunits show distinct responses over the exercise periods and for the different structures analyzed In general, there was increased expression of GluR subunits after longer exercise periods (such as EX30) although some opposite effects were seen after short periods of exercise (Ex3) In a few cases biphasic patterns with decreases and subsequent increases of GluR expression were seen and may represent the outcome of exercise dependent, complex regulatory processes The data show that the protocol used was able to promote plastic GluR changes during exercise, suggesting a specific involvement of these receptors in exercise induced plasticity processes in the brain areas tested (C) 2010 Elsevier B V All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据