4.5 Article

In vitro non-viral lipofectamine delivery of the gene for glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor to human umbilical cord blood CD34+cells

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1325, 期 -, 页码 147-154

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.022

关键词

Growth factor; Transfection; Liposome; Plasmid; Stem cells

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30572079]
  2. Department of Education of China [2007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using a lipofection technique, we explored a non-viral delivery of plasmid DNA encoding a rat pGDNF (glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor) to CD34+ cells derived from human umbilical cord blood (HUCB) cells in order to obtain cells stably expressing the GDNF gene. The target gene GDNF was amplified from cortex cells of newborn Sprague Dawley rats by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and inserted into vector pEGFP-N1 to construct the eukaryotic expression vector pEGFP/GDNF. The positive clones were identified by sequencing and endonuclease digestion. The expression of pEGFP/GDNF-transfected HUCB cells CD34+ was examined by ELISA. Single fragment of 640 bp was obtained after the rat GDNF cDNA was amplified by RT-PCR. Two fragments of about 4.3 kb and 640 pb were obtained after digestion of recombinant plasmid pEGFP/GDNF with XhoI/KpnI. The nucleic acid fragment of 640 bp was confirmed to agree well with the sequence of GDNF gene published by GenBank. The expression of GDNF mRNA and the level of GDNF from pEGFP/GDNF-transfected CD34+ cells were increased substantially, compared with pEGFP control plasmid transfected CD34+ cells (P<0.05). Moreover, co-culture of primary rat cells with the pEGFP/GDNF-transfected CD34+ cells promoted enhanced neuroprotection against oxygen-glucose deprivation induced cell dysfunctions. The present results support the use of the non-viral plasmid liposome for therapeutic gene expression for stem cell therapy. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据