4.5 Article

Taurine protects transformed rat retinal ganglion cells from hypoxia-induced apoptosis by preventing mitochondrial dysfunction

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1279, 期 -, 页码 131-138

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.04.054

关键词

Taurine; Hypoxia; Apoptosis; Mitochondria; Retinal ganglion cell line

资金

  1. Eleventh Five-Year Plan for Medical Science Development of PLA, China [062028]
  2. Free Courses of Key Laboratory of Nutrition and Food Safety of Chongqing, China (2007)
  3. Third Military Medical University of China [2007XG19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypoxia-induced apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) is the major cause of progressive vision loss in numerous retinal diseases, including glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy. Taurine is a naturally occurring free amino acid that has been shown to have neurotrophic and neuroprotective properties in the retina. We investigated the specific potential for taurine to be protective for immortalized rat retinal ganglion cells (RGC-5) exposed to hypoxia (5% O-2). Pretreatment of RGC-5 cells with 0.1 mM taurine significantly reduced the extent of apoptosis detected by DAPI staining, MTT, and Annexin V-FITC/PI assays, To further study the mechanism underlying the beneficial effect of taurine, interactions between taurine and the process of mitochondria-mediated apoptosis were examined. Taurine treatment of RGC-5 cells suppressed the induction of the mitochondrial permeability transition (mPT) by reducing intracellular calcium levels and inhibiting the opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pores (mPTPs). Moreover, the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, a decline in cellular ATP levels, a reduction in the amount of cytochrome c translocated to the cytoplasm and caspase-3 activation were observed in taurine-treated cultures. These results demonstrate the potential for taurine to protect RGCs against hypoxic damage in vivo by preventing mitochondrial dysfunction. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据