4.5 Article

Regulation of CART peptide expression by CREB in the rat nucleus accumbens in vivo

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1251, 期 -, 页码 42-52

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.011

关键词

CREB; CART peptide; Psychostimulant; Nucleus accumbens

资金

  1. NIH/NIDA [RR00165, DA00418, DA15162, DA015040, DA08227, 5F31DA0219]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Production of mRNA from the cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART) gene is regulated by cocaine and other drugs of abuse in the nucleus accumbens (NAc), a brain reward region. Current hypotheses postulate that CART peptides there oppose the rewarding actions of cocaine by opposing the effects of dopaminergic transmission. Since over expression of CREB was shown to decrease cocaine-mediated reward, we hypothesized that CART could be a target gene for CREB in the NAc and that over expression of CREB would increase CART peptide levels. Transcription factor (TF) binding to DNA is influenced by sequences adjacent to consensus TF binding sites and other factors. We thus examined CREB binding to a 27mer oligonucleotide containing the CRE sequence from the CART gene proximal promoter. Using electrophoretic mobility shift assays and TF-antibody super shift assays, CREB was found to bind to the CRE sequence from the CART promoter. To test if over expression of CREB in the NAc affected CART peptide levels, Herpes simplex virus-1 vectors over expressing CREB (HSV-CREB), or a vector that expressed LacZ (HSV-LacZ) as a control, were injected into the NAc of rats. Western blotting and in situ hybridization showed that HSV-CREB injections increased CART mRNA and peptide levels. Injections of a dominant negative CREB mutant (HSV-mCREB) did not alter either CART mRNA or peptide levels. The finding that CREB can regulate the levels of CART mRNA and peptides in vivo in the NAc supports a role for CART peptides in psychostimulant-induced reward and reinforcement. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据