4.5 Article

The impact of paracrine signaling in brain microvascular endothelial cells on the survival of neurons

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1287, 期 -, 页码 28-38

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.06.057

关键词

Brain microvascular endothelial cell; Paracrine; Neuron; Calcium overload; Mitochondrium

资金

  1. The National Basic Research Program 973 Program [2005CB523311]
  2. National natural science foundation of china [30572284]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurons depend for survival on local neurotrophic factors which act in an autocrine/paracrine manner. However, the effect of paracrine signaling of brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs) under pathological conditions on neuron survival is not fully understood. in this study we cultured rat BMECs and cortical neurons. BMECs were cultured in oxygen-glucose-deprived (OGD) conditions to mimic cerebral ischemia in vitro. The conditioned media of normal BMECs or OGD-injured BMECs were used to culture normal or injured neurons. Neuron activity, free Ca2+ concentration, NMDA receptor status, mitochondrial membrane potential and cytochrome C release level were determined. The results showed: mitochondrial activity of injured neurons was significantly increased and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) leakage was decreased (P<0.05) by grown in conditioned medium of normal BMECs. Inversely, mitochondrial activity of normal or injured neurons was decreased and LDH leakage was significantly increased (P<0.05) by grown in conditioned medium of injured BMECs. The changes in free Ca2+ concentration, NMDA receptor status, mitochondrial membrane potential and cytochrome C release level were consistent with the changes in neuronal activity. These findings suggest that the conditioned medium of normal BMECs has a neuroprotective effect. However, this protective effect was lost after BMECs injury; in fact, the conditioned medium became neurotoxic. Therefore, it appears that early recovery of BMECs might be helpful for neuron survival. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据