4.5 Article

Neuronal and astrocytic apoptosis after subarachnoid hemorrhage: A possible cause for poor prognosis

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1238, 期 -, 页码 163-171

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.08.031

关键词

Apoptosis; Astrocyte; Cerebral vasospasm; Neuron; Subarachnoid hemorrhage

资金

  1. American Heart Association, the National Institutes of Health [NS25946]
  2. Brain Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clinical evidence suggests that factors other than cerebral vasospasm, such as delayed neuronal and astrocytic cell death, may play a role in the poor prognosis of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Here we examined this using immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy in 3 different brain areas in a dog model of SAH. Using antibodies against neuronal marker neuronal nuclear protein (NeuN) and astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) in conjunction with apoptosis marker (cleaved caspase-3), we quantified neurons and astrocytes to monitor the degree of apoptosis in both groups. Experimental SAH group showed 44 +/- 1% caspase-3 positive neurons in comparison to the 2.0 +/- 0.1% in the control group (P < 0.001, 6 animals each group). For astrocytes, a total 25 +/- 1% were caspase-3 positive in day 7 SAH group, as compared to 0.40 +/- 0.01% for controls (P < 0.001). Regional analysis revealed that neuronal caspase-3 immunoreactivity in all 3 regions were significantly higher (P < 0.001) in SAH animals than that in the control animals. However, the analysis of total area, size and signal co-localization of GFAP with caspase-3 indicated that astrocytic reactivity and proliferation are seen primarily in the hippocampal area, with the least changes detectable in the brainstem. We conclude that in the dog model, there was a significant increase of neuronal and astrocytic cleaved caspase-3, possibly reflecting apoptosis, following SAH induction. These changes coupled with neurological deterioration seen in patients may present a possible reason for the poor outcome in SAH patients. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据