4.5 Article

The firing activity of presumed cholinergic and non-cholinergic neurons of the pedunculopontine nucleus in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats: An in vivo electrophysiological study

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1243, 期 -, 页码 152-160

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.09.028

关键词

Pedunculopontine nucleus; Cholinergic neuron; Non-cholinergic neuron; Parkinson's disease; Extracellular recording

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2007C205]
  2. Science and Technological Project of Shaanxi Province, China [2007K15-G1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several studies have shown that the neuronal activity of the pedunculopontine nucleus is increased in Parkinson's disease. in the present study, the changes were examined in the firing rate and firing pattern of presumed cholinergic and non-cholinergic neurons in the pedunculopontine nucleus of 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats by using extracellular recording. In the lesioned rats, the mean firing rate of both presumed cholinergic and non-cholinergic neurons in the pedunculopontine nucleus increased significantly compared to normal rats. With regard to firing pattern, the majority of presumed cholinergic and non-cholinergic neurons fired regularly in normal rats. After substantia nigra pars compactalesion, the percentage of presumed non-cholinergic neurons exhibiting irregular pattern increased significantly compared to normal rats, while having no significant change in the firing pattern of presumed cholinergic neurons. Collectively, these results indicate that the presumed cholinergic and non-cholinergic neurons in the pedunculopontine nucleus are overactive in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats, particularly, presumed non-cholinergic neuron firing is more irregular, which suggests that the firing activity of presumed cholinergic and non-cholinergic neurons is affected by the different afferents from the basal ganglia and related structures. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据