4.5 Article

Acoustic modulation of immediate early gene expression in the auditory midbrain of female tungara frogs

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1190, 期 -, 页码 105-114

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.11.008

关键词

acoustic communication; torus semicircularis; Physalaemus pustulosus; egr-1 zenk; fos

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To better understand the molecular consequences of auditory processing in frogs, we investigated the acoustic modulation of two immediate early genes (IEGs), egr-1 and fos, in the auditory midbrain of female tungara frogs. Since tungara frog egr-1 had already been identified, we first isolated a tungara-specific fos clone using degenerate PCR followed by Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends. In order to examine the temporal kinetics of acoustically modulated IEG mRNA expression, we first acoustically isolated females collected from a mating chorus and analyzed the decline in IEG expression in the torus semicircularis (homolog of the inferior colliculus). We found that IEG mRNA levels declined rapidly and reached baseline within 2 h. Next, we presented females with a 30-min recording of a mating chorus and analyzed IEG expression following different survival times. We found that IEG expression increased within 15-30 min of sound presentation but, compared to other vertebrates, in the tungara frog it took longer to reach the highest and lowest mRNA levels in response to sound and isolation, respectively. We also found that acoustic stimulation of egr-1 and fos differed in the three subdivisions of the torus semicircularis, suggesting that, as in birds, the two genes could provide largely different information when used in IEG mapping studies. While our results confirm the generality of sensory-induced IEG expression in vertebrates, whether the longer time course of IEG expression that we observed represents a species difference in the mechanisms of IEG transcription awaits further study. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据