4.5 Article

Del-1 gene transfer induces cerebral angiogenesis in mice

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1219, 期 -, 页码 1-7

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.05.003

关键词

angiogenesis; brain Del-1; gene transfer; ischemia

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R21 NS053943, R01 NS027713, R21 NS053943-02, R21 NS053943-01A1, R01 NS27713, P01 NS44145] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Developmental endothelial locus-1 (Del-1) is a novel angiomatrix protein that has been shown to stimulate a potent angiogenic response and promote functional recovery in hindlimb and cardiac ischemia in animal models; however, its impact on cerebral angiogenesis is unknown. in this study, we investigated whether Del-1 overexpression via gene transfer induces cerebral angiogenesis in a murine model, and examined Del-1 expression after ischemic stroke. Cerebral Del-1 overexpression was achieved with AAV (adeno-associated virus) transduction system via stereotactic injection. Control mice were injected with AAV-lacZ. Del-1 gene transduction led to a significant induction of cerebral angiogenesis compared to AAV-lacZ treatment at 4 weeks after gene transfer (Del-1: 97 +/- 7 us lacZ: 64 +/- 28, vessels/ field, p<0.05). Mice transduced with AAV-Del-1 showed significantly elevated vascular densities for up to 6 weeks after gene delivery. In addition, double immunofluorescent staining showed co-localization of endothelial cell marker CD31 with BrdU (specific marker for proliferating cells), indicating that Del-1 promoted endogenous endothelial cell proliferation and angiogenesis. Our immunohistochemical staining also showed that Del-1 expression was markedly up-regulated in the peri-infarct area at 3 days after permanent focal cerebral ischemia. compared to the sham-operated non-ischemic control. Our data suggest that Del-1 may participate in modulating cerebral angiogenesis, and that gene transfer of Del-1 may provide a novel and potent means for stimulating cerebral angiogenesis. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据