4.5 Article

Optimization of a therapeutic protocol for intravenous injection of human mesenchymal stem cells after cerebral ischemia in adult rats

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1236, 期 -, 页码 30-38

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.116

关键词

Regeneration; Stem cell; Stroke; Transplantation; Meschenchymal stem cell

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture [16390414, 20390388]
  2. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (U.S.A) [RG2135, CA1009A10]
  3. National Institutes of Health [NS43432]
  4. Medical and Rehabilitation and Development Research Services of the Department of Veterans Affairs
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20390388, 16390414] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The systemic injection of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) prepared from adult bone marrow has therapeutic benefits after cerebral artery occlusion in rats, and may have multiple therapeutic effects at various sites and times within the lesion as the cells respond to a particular pathological microenvironment. However, the comparative therapeutic benefits of multiple injections of hMSCs at different time points after cerebral artery occlusion in rats remain unclear. in this study, we induced middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) in rats using intra-luminal vascular occlusion, and infused hMSCs intravenously at a single 6 h time point (low and high cell doses) and various multiple time points after MCAO. From MRI analyses lesion volume was reduced in all hMSC cell injection groups as compared to serum alone injections. However, the greatest therapeutic benefit was achieved following a single high cell dose injection at 6 h post-MCAO, rather than multiple lower cell infusions over multiple time points. Three-dimensional analysis of capillary vessels in the lesion indicated that the capillary volume was equally increased in all of the cell-injected groups. Thus, differences in functional outcome in the hMSC transplantation subgroups are not likely the result of differences in angiogenesis, but rather from differences in neuroprotective effects. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据