4.4 Article

A pilot study of contralateral homonymous muscle activity simulated electrical stimulation in chronic hemiplegia

期刊

BRAIN INJURY
卷 26, 期 9, 页码 1105-1112

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2012.666368

关键词

Upper extremity; neuromuscular electrical stimulation; stroke rehabilitation; bilateral movement; electromyogram; hemiplegia

资金

  1. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan
  2. Strategic Research Program for Brain Sciences, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  3. Funding Program for Next Generation World-Leading Researchers, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: For the recovery of hemiparetic hand function, a therapy was developed called contralateral homonymous muscle activity stimulated electrical stimulation (CHASE), which combines electrical stimulation and bilateral movements, and its feasibility was studued in three chronic stroke patients with severe hand hemiparesis. Methods: Patients with a subcortical lesion were asked to extend their wrist and fingers bilaterally while an electromyogram (EMG) was recorded from the extensor carpi radialis (ECR) muscle in the unaffected hand. Electric stimulation was applied to the homonymous wrist and finger extensors of the affected side. The intensity of the electrical stimulation was computed based on the EMG and scaled so that the movements of the paretic hand looked similar to those of the unaffected side. The patients received 30-minutes of therapy per day for 2 weeks. Results: Improvement in the active range of motion of wrist extension was observed for all patients. There was a decrease in the scores of modified Ashworth scale in the flexors. Fugl-Meyer assessment scores of motor function of the upper extremities improved in two of the patients. Conclusions: The results suggest a positive outcome can be obtained using the CHASE system for upper extremity rehabilitation of patients with severe hemiplegia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据