4.7 Article

Innate immunity in the postmortem brain of depressed and suicide subjects: Role of Toll-like receptors

期刊

BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND IMMUNITY
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 101-111

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2018.09.024

关键词

Toll-like receptors (TLRs); Cytokines; Depression; Suicide; Postmortem brain; Innate immunity

资金

  1. National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, MD [RO1MH098554, RO1 MH106565]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [R01MH098554, R01MH106565] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Abnormalities of Toll-like receptors (TLRs) have been implicated in the pathophysiology of depression and suicide. Interactions of TLRs with pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP) and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMP) initiate signaling through myeloid differentiation primary response-88 (MyD88) and produce cytokines through the activation of the transcription factor nuclear factor kappa beta (NF-kB). We have earlier shown an increase in the protein and mRNA expression of TLR3 and TLR4 in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) of depressed suicide (DS) subjects compared with normal control (NC) subjects. To examine if other TLRs are altered in postmortem brain, we have now determined the protein and mRNA expression of other TLRs (TLR1, TLR2, TLR5, TLR6, TLR7, TLR8, TLR9 and TLR10) in the PFC of DS, depressed non-suicide (DNS), non-depressed suicide (NDS) and NC subjects. We determined the protein expression by Western blot and mRNA expression levels by real-time PCR (qPCR) in the PFC of 24 NC, 24 DS, 12 DNS and 11 NDS subjects. Combined with our previous study of TLR3 and TLR4, we found that the protein expression of TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, TLR6 and TLR10, and mRNA expression of TLR2 and TLR3 was significantly increased in the DS group compared with NC group. This study demonstrated that certain specific TLRs are altered in DS subjects, and hence those TLRs may be appropriate targets for the development of therapeutic agents for the treatment of suicidal behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据