4.7 Article

CD4+ T cell-mediated neuroprotection is independent of T cell-derived BDNF in a mouse facial nerve axotomy model

期刊

BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND IMMUNITY
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 886-890

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2012.02.011

关键词

CD4; T cell; Brain-derived neurotrophic factor; Facial nerve axotomy; Motoneuron survival; Conditional gene knockout

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NS40433]
  2. Muscular Dystrophy Association [MDA202906]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The production of neurotrophic factors, such as BDNF, has generally been considered an important mechanism of immune-mediated neuroprotection. However, the ability of T cells to produce BDNF remains controversial. Methods: In the present study, we examined mRNA and protein of BDNF using RT-PCR and western blot, respectively, in purified and reactivated CD4(+) T cells. In addition, to determine the role of BDNF derived from CD4(+) T cells, the BDNF gene was specifically deleted in T cells using the Cre-lox mouse model system. Results: Our results indicate that while both mRNA expression and protein secretion of BDNF in reactivated T cells were detected at 24 h, only protein could be detected at 72 h after reactivation. The results suggest a transient up-regulation of BDNF mRNA in reactivated T cells. Furthermore, in contrast to our hypothesis that the BDNF expression is necessary for CD4(+) T cells to mediate neuroprotection, mice with CD4(+) T cells lacking BDNF expression demonstrated a similar level of facial motoneuron survival compared to their littermates that expressed BDNF, and both levels were comparable to wild-type. The results suggest that the deletion of BDNF did not impair CD4(+) T cell-mediated neuroprotection. Conclusion: Collectively, while CD4(+) T cells are a potential source of BDNF after nerve injury, production of BDNF is not necessary for CD4(+) T cells to mediate their neuroprotective effects. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据