4.7 Article

Human CD8+ T cells and NK cells express and secrete S100B upon stimulation

期刊

BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND IMMUNITY
卷 25, 期 6, 页码 1233-1241

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2011.03.015

关键词

S100; S100B; Psychoimmunology; T cells; Lymphocytes; Granulocytes; Monocytes; RAGE

资金

  1. DFG [SPP1110, Ja 1058/1-3, SFB738, A5]
  2. Stanley Medical Research Foundation [07R-1832]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies have demonstrated the utility of S100B as a surrogate marker of brain-related pathologies, e.g. neuropsychiatric disorders, and melanoma progression, which have an inflammatory component. This study addresses the relevance of S100B(+) lymphocytes in mediating such responses. S100B expression was determined in human peripheral blood leukocytes isolated from healthy volunteers using flow cytometry. S100B(+) lymphocytes were characterised for phenotype, cytokine production and S100B secretion. In addition, we investigated whether S100B activates monocytes and neutrophils. S100B(+) cells comprised 2-4% of all lymphocytes and the majority displayed a CD3(+) CD8(+) phenotype; fewer cells were CD3(-) CD56(+) NK lymphocytes. Comparison of S100B(+) and S100B(-) CD3(+) CD8(+) cells revealed no differences in production of interferon gamma (IFN gamma) and interleukin-2 (IL-2). Stimulation of S100B(+) CD3(+) CD8(+) lymphocytes with anti-CD3 or phytohaemagglutinin resulted in release of S100B. High concentrations of recombinant human S100B triggered upregulation of CD11b and membrane shedding of CD62L in granulocytes and monocytes. These findings set the stage for a new field of research addressing a S100B-mediated crosstalk between the innate and adaptive immune systems if close proximity of effector and responder cells accomplishes sufficient local S100B levels. In various physiological and pathological conditions S100B might function as an interface to immunological processes, distinct from known cytokine- and chemokine-mediated pathways. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据