4.7 Article

Neuroprotection effects of retained acupuncture in neurotoxin-induced Parkinson's disease mice

期刊

BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND IMMUNITY
卷 25, 期 7, 页码 1452-1459

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2011.05.012

关键词

Acupuncture; MPTP; Neurotoxin-induced; Mice; Parkinson's disease; Neuroprotection

资金

  1. National Council Science [NSC 97-2627-B-010-008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to investigate the role of retained acupuncture (RA) in neurotoxin-induced Parkinson's disease (PD) mice. Male C57BL/6 mice were injected with 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) to induce the PD model. The mice were divided into four groups, namely, (1) normal; (2) MPTP + retained acupuncture (RA); (3) MPTP + electroacupuncture (EA); (4) MPTP + sham acupuncture (SA). After mice being manipulated with/without acupuncture at acupoints (Daling, PC 7), groups 2-4 were injected with MPTP (15 mg/kg/d). The mice were evaluated for behavioral changes, in terms of time of landing, after acupuncture treatment. The animals were sacrificed and their brains assayed for dopamine and its metabolites and tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) expression by using HPLC and immunohistochemistry/Western blotting, respectively. [(123)I] IBZM-SPECT imaging between SA and RA groups were compared. The results showed that the time of landing of the three groups with treatment was significant longer than group 1 (normal) (4.33 +/- 0.15 s). Nonetheless, group 2 (RA) (7.13 +/- 0.20 s) had a shorter time of landing than group 4 (SA) (7.89 +/- 0.46 s). The number of TH (+) neurons and the expression of TH proteins were significantly higher in the RA group than in the SA/EA groups. RA also increased the uptake of [(123)I] IBZM into the triatum compared to the SA group. We conclude that RA possibly attenuates neuronal damage in MPTP-induced PD mice, which suggests RA may be useful as a complementary strategy when treating human PD. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据