4.7 Article

Shallow rainwater lenses in deltaic areas with saline seepage

期刊

HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES
卷 15, 期 12, 页码 3659-3678

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/hess-15-3659-2011

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In deltaic areas with saline seepage, freshwater availability is often limited to shallow rainwater lenses lying on top of saline groundwater. Here we describe the characteristics and spatial variability of such lenses in areas with saline seepage and the mechanisms that control their occurrence and size. Our findings are based on different types of field measurements and detailed numerical groundwater models applied in the south-western delta of the Netherlands. By combining the applied techniques we could extrapolate measurements at point scale (groundwater sampling, temperature and electrical soil conductivity (TEC)-probe measurements, electrical cone penetration tests (ECPT)) to field scale (continuous vertical electrical soundings (CVES), electromagnetic survey with EM31), and even to regional scale using helicopter-borne electromagnetic measurements (HEM). The measurements show a gradual mixing zone between infiltrating fresh rainwater and upward flowing saline groundwater. The mixing zone is best characterized by the depth of the centre of the mixing zone D-mix, where the salinity is half that of seepage water, and the bottom of the mixing zone B-mix, with a salinity equal to that of the seepage water (Cl-conc. 10 to 16 g l(-1)). D-mix is found at very shallow depth in the confining top layer, on average at 1.7 m below ground level (b.g.l.), while B-mix lies about 2.5 m b.g.l. The model results show that the constantly alternating upward and downward flow at low velocities in the confining layer is the main mechanism of mixing between rainwater and saline seepage and determines the position and extent of the mixing zone (D-mix and B-mix). Recharge, seepage flux, and drainage depth are the controlling factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据