4.4 Review

Syntheses, Structures and Antioxidant Activities of Fullerenols: Knowledge Learned at the Atomistic Level

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLUSTER SCIENCE
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 375-388

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10876-015-0855-0

关键词

Fullerenols; Synthesis; Structure; Reaction mechanism; Antioxidant activity

资金

  1. CAS Hundreds Elite Program
  2. NSFC [21373226]
  3. MOST 973 program [2012CB934001]
  4. Jiangxi Normal University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fullerenol nanoparticles have intriguing potentials in biomedical applications. However, the structures, mechanisms of syntheses and mechanisms of antioxidant activities of fullerenols at the atomistic level, which substantialize their properties and applications, remain opened questions. Here, we review the syntheses, structures and antioxidant activities of fullerenols. Especially, we focus on the knowledge at the atomistic level. Experimentally, fullerenols can be synthesized using oxidation reactions in either acidic conditions or alkaline conditions. The latter reactions yield fullerenols with high hydroxyl numbers and better water solubility. For fullerenol structures, a precision structural model has been recently proposed for C-60 fullerenols, which explain the experimentally-observed radical anion properties and pH-dependent infrared spectroscopic properties. Calculations have suggested that the most thermodynamically stable structures of many fullerenols have hydroxyls located aggregately in islands on the fullerene cages, although the most stable configuration of C-60(OH)(24) has hydroxyls distributed on C-60 equator. Two different center dot OH-scavenging mechanisms are possible for fullerenols. Fullerenols with low degrees of hydroxylation prefer the center dot OH addition mechanism, whereas those with high degrees of hydroxylation prefer the hydrogen abstraction mechanism. The O (2) (a (TM) a') -scavenging mechanism is related to redox potentials, charges and H-bond nets of the fullerenols.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据