4.7 Article

Carbon transport by the Lena River from its headwaters to the Arctic Ocean, with emphasis on fluvial input of terrestrial particulate organic carbon vs. carbon transport by coastal erosion

期刊

BIOGEOSCIENCES
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 2407-2426

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/bg-8-2407-2011

关键词

-

资金

  1. Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (FEBRAS)
  2. International Arctic Research Center (IARC) of the University of Alaska Fairbanks
  3. Cooperative Institute for Arctic Research through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) [NA17RJ1224]
  4. US National Science Foundation [OPP-0327664, OPP-0230455, ARC-1023281, ARC-0909546]
  5. NOAA Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research (OAR) Climate Program Office [NA08OAR4600758]
  6. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [07-05-64819, 08-05-00184, 08-05-00191, 10-05-00996, 11-05-00781, 11-05-12021, 11-05-12027, 11-05-12028, 11-05-12032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Lena River integrates biogeochemical signals from its vast drainage basin, and the integrated signal reaches far out over the Arctic Ocean. Transformation of riverine organic carbon (OC) into mineral carbon, and mineral carbon into the organic form in the Lena River watershed, can be considered to be quasi-steady-state processes. An increase in Lena discharge exerts opposite effects on total organic (TOC) and total inorganic (TCO2) carbon: TOC concentration increases, while TCO2 concentration decreases. Significant inter-annual variability in mean values of TCO2, TOC, and their sum (total carbon, TC) has been found. This variability is determined by changes in land hydrology which cause differences in the Lena River discharge. There is a negative correlation in the Lena River between TC in September and its mean discharge in August; a time shift of about one month is required for water to travel from Yakutsk to the Laptev Sea. Total carbon entering the sea with the Lena discharge is estimated to be almost 10 Tg C yr(-1). The annual Lena River discharge of particulate organic carbon (POC) can be as high as 0.38 Tg (moderate to high estimate). If we instead accept Lisytsin's (1994) statement that 85-95% of total particulate matter (PM) (and POC) precipitates on the marginal filter, then only about 0.03-0.04 Tg of Lena River POC reaches the Laptev Sea. The Lena's POC export would then be two orders of magnitude less than the annual input of eroded terrestrial carbon onto the shelf of the Laptev and East Siberian seas, which is estimated to be about 4 Tg. Observations support the hypothesis of a dominant role for coastal erosion (Semiletov, 1999a, b) in East Siberian Arctic Shelf (ESAS) sedimentation and the dynamics of the carbon/carbonate system. The Lena River is characterized by relatively high concentrations of the primary greenhouse gases, dissolved carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4). During all seasons the river is supersaturated in CO2 compared to the atmosphere, by up to 1.5-2 fold in summer, and 4-5 fold in winter. This results in a significant CO2 supersaturation in the adjacent coastal sea. Localized areas of dissolved CH4 along the Lena River and in the Lena delta channels may reach 100 nM, but the CH4 concentration decreases to 5-20nM towards the sea, which suggests that riverborne export of CH4 plays but a minor role in determining the ESAS CH4 budget in coastal waters. Instead, the seabed appears to be the source that provides most of the CH4 to the Arctic Ocean.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据