4.4 Article

Is relational reasoning dependent on language? A voxel-based lesion symptom mapping study

期刊

BRAIN AND LANGUAGE
卷 113, 期 2, 页码 59-64

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2010.01.004

关键词

Aphasia; Language; Reasoning; Temporal lobe; Lesion mapping; Problem-solving; Executive functioning

资金

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs
  2. NIH/NINDS [5 P01 NS040813]
  3. NIH/NIDCD [5 R01 DC00216]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies with brain-injured patients have suggested that language abilities are necessary for complex problem-solving, even when tasks are non-verbal. In the current study, we tested this notion by analyzing behavioral and neuroimaging data from a large group of left-hemisphere stroke patients (n = 107) suffering from a range of language impairment from none to severe Patients were tested on the Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices (RCPM), a non-verbal test of reasoning that requires participants to complete a visual pattern or sequence with one of six possible choices For some items, the solution could be determined by visual pattern-matching, but other items required more complex, relational reasoning As predicted, performance on the relational-reasoning items was disproportionately affected in language-impaired patients with aphasia, relative to non-aphasic, left-hemisphere patients A voxel-based lesion symptom mapping (VLSM) procedure was used to relate patients' RCPM performance with areas of damage in the brain Results showed that deficits on the relational reasoning problems were associated with lesions in the left middle and superior temporal gyri, regions essential for language processing, as well as in the left inferior parietal lobule In contrast, the visual pattern-matching condition was associated with lesions in posterior portions of the left hemisphere that subserve visual processing, namely, occipital and inferotemporal cortex These findings provide compelling support for the idea that language is critical for higher-level reasoning and problem-solving Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据