4.4 Article

Myelin breakdown mediates age-related slowing in cognitive processing speed in healthy elderly men

期刊

BRAIN AND COGNITION
卷 81, 期 1, 页码 131-138

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.09.006

关键词

Healthy aging; Cognition; Cognitive processing speed; Myelin; White matter; Magnetic resonance imaging

资金

  1. National Institute of Aging (NIA) [K23-AG028727]
  2. NIH [MH 0266029, AG027342]
  3. Alzheimer's Disease Research Center [P50 AG-16570]
  4. Alzheimer's Disease Research Center of California
  5. RCS Alzheimer's Foundation
  6. Department of Veterans Affairs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: To assess the hypothesis that in a sample of very healthy elderly men selected to minimize risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and cerebrovascular disease, myelin breakdown in late-myelinating regions mediates age-related slowing in cognitive processing speed (CPS). Materials and methods: The prefrontal lobe white matter and the genu of the corpus callosum myelinate later in brain development (late-myelinating white matter; LMWM) and are more vulnerable to breakdown due to the effects of normal aging. An in vivo MRI biomarker of myelin integrity (transverse relaxation rates; R-2) of LMWM was obtained for 38 very healthy elderly adult men (mean age = 66.3 years; SD = 6.0; range = 55-76). To evaluate regional specificity, we also assessed a contrasting early-myelinating region (splenium of the corpus callosum; SWM), which primarily contains axons involved in visual processing. CPS was assessed using the Trail Making Test. Results: LMWM R-2 and CPS measures were significantly correlated (r = .515, p = .0009), but no significant association between R-2 and CPS was detected in the splenium (p = .409). LMWM R-2, but not SWM R-2, was a significant mediator of the relationship between age and CPS (p = .037). Conclusions: In this very healthy elderly sample, age-related slowing in CPS is mediated by myelin breakdown in highly vulnerable late-myelinating regions but not in the splenium. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据