4.2 Article

Evaluation of the GABAergic nervous system in autistic brain: 123I-iomazenil SPECT study

期刊

BRAIN & DEVELOPMENT
卷 34, 期 8, 页码 648-654

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2011.10.007

关键词

Autistic spectrum disorders (ASD); I-123-iomazenil SPECT; gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA); Epilepsy

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23591709, 23591570] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To evaluate the GABA(A) receptor in the autistic brain, we performed I-123-IMZ SPECT in patients with ASD. We compared I-123-IMZ SPECT abnormalities in patients who showed intellectual disturbance or focal epileptic discharge on EEG to those in patients without such findings. Subjects and methods: The subjects consisted of 24 patients with ASD (mean age, 7.3 +/- 3.5 years), including 9 with autistic disorder (mean age, 7.0 +/- 3.7 years) and 15 with Asperger's disorder (mean age, 7.5 +/- 3.2 years). We used 10 non-symptomatic partial epilepsy patients (mean age, 7.8 +/- 3.6 years) without intellectual delay as a control group. For an objective evaluation of the I-123-IMZ SPECT results, we performed an SEE (Stereotactic Extraction Estimation) analysis to describe the decrease in accumulation in each brain lobule numerically. Results: In the comparison of the ASD group and the control group, there was a dramatic decrease in the accumulation of I-123-IMZ in the superior and medial frontal cortex. In the group with intellectual impairment and focal epileptic discharge on EEG, the decrease in accumulation in the superior and medial frontal cortex was greater than that in the group without these findings. Conclusion: The present results suggest that disturbance of the GABAergic nervous system may contribute to the pathophysiology and aggravation of ASD, since the accumulation of I-123-IMZ was decreased in the superior and medial frontal cortex, which is considered to be associated with inference of the thoughts, feelings, and intentions of others (Theory of Mind). (C) 2011 The Japanese Society of Child Neurology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据