4.7 Review

Inability to empathize: brain lesions that disrupt sharing and understanding another's emotions

期刊

BRAIN
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 981-997

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awt317

关键词

empathy; stroke; emotion; focal lesion studies

资金

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [RO1NS47691]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Imaging studies reveal activation of numerous brain regions in healthy individuals performing emotional empathy tasks. To identify regions critical for empathy, Hillis reviews studies of patients with impaired empathy after focal injury. Lesions to several areas disrupt empathy, but selective deficits in specific underlying cognitive processes are rarely reported.Emotional empathy-the ability to recognize, share in, and make inferences about another person's emotional state-is critical for all social interactions. The neural mechanisms underlying emotional empathy have been widely studied with functional imaging of healthy participants. However, functional imaging studies reveal correlations between areas of activation and performance of a task, so that they can only reveal areas engaged in a task, rather than areas of the brain that are critical for the task. Lesion studies complement functional imaging, to identify areas necessary for a task. Impairments in emotional empathy have been mostly studied in neurological diseases with fairly diffuse injury, such as traumatic brain injury, autism and dementia. The classic 'focal lesion' is stroke. There have been scattered studies of patients with impaired empathy after stroke and other focal injury, but these studies have included small numbers of patients. This review will bring together data from these studies, to complement evidence from functional imaging. Here I review how focal lesions affect emotional empathy. I will show how lesion studies contribute to the understanding of the cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying emotional empathy, and how they contribute to the management of patients with impaired emotional empathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据