4.7 Article

CD161highCD8+T cells bear pathogenetic potential in multiple sclerosis

期刊

BRAIN
卷 134, 期 -, 页码 542-554

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awq354

关键词

multiple sclerosis; gene expression; CD161; IL-17; CCR6

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [56, LSHM-CT-2005-01863]
  2. Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To identify differentially expressed genes in multiple sclerosis, microarrays were used in a stringent experimental setting-leukapheresis from disease-discordant monozygotic twins and gene expression profiling in CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell subsets. Disease-related differences emerged only in the CD8(+) T-cell subset. The five differentially expressed genes identified included killer cell lectin-like receptor subfamily B, member 1, also known as natural killer receptor protein 1a/CD161, presented by the International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium as one of the non-MHC candidate loci. Flow cytometric analysis on peripheral blood of healthy donors and patients with multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis confirmed an upregulation of CD161 at the protein level, showing also a significant excess of CD161(high)CD8(+) T cells in multiple sclerosis. This subset prevalently included chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 6(+), cytokine-producing, effector-memory T cells with proinflammatory profiles. It also included all circulating interleukin-17(+)CD8(+) T cells. In the CD161(high)CD8(+) subset, interleukin-12 facilitated proliferation and interferon-gamma production, with CD161 acting as a co-stimulatory receptor. CD161(+)CD8(+)CD3(+) T cells producing interferon-gamma were part of intralesional immune infiltrates and ectopic B cell follicles in autopsy multiple sclerosis brains. Variations of CD161 expression on CD8(+) T cells identify a subset of lymphocytes with proinflammatory characteristics that have not been previously reported in multiple sclerosis and are likely to contribute to disease immunopathology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据