4.7 Article

Delayed post-ischaemic neuroprotection following systemic neural stem cell transplantation involves multiple mechanisms

期刊

BRAIN
卷 132, 期 -, 页码 2239-2251

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awp174

关键词

stroke; neural stem; precursor cells; transplantation; inflammation; gliosis

资金

  1. NCCR Neural plasticity
  2. COST Short Term Scientific Mission [COST-STSM-BM0603-2843]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [3200B0-112056/1]
  4. BMW Italy Group
  5. Banca Agricola Popolare di Ragusa

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent evidence suggests that neural stem/precursor cells (NPCs) promote recovery in animal models with delayed neuronal death via a number of indirect bystander effects. A comprehensive knowledge of how transplanted NPCs exert their therapeutic effects is still lacking. Here, we investigated the effects of a delayed transplantation of adult syngenic NPCsinjected intravenously 72 h after transient middle cerebral artery occlusionon neurological recovery, histopathology and gene expression. NPC-transplanted mice showed a significantly improved recovery from 18 days post-transplantation (dpt) onwards, which persisted throughout the study. A small percentage of injected NPCs accumulated in the brain, integrating mainly in the infarct boundary zone, where most of the NPCs remained undifferentiated up to 30 dpt. Histopathological analysis revealed a hitherto unreported very delayed neuroprotective effect of NPCs, becoming evident at 10 and 30 dpt. Tissue survival was associated with downregulation of markers of inflammation, glial scar formation and neuronal apoptotic death at both mRNA and protein levels. Our data highlight the relevance of very delayed degenerative processes in the stroke brain that are intimately associated with inflammatory and glial responses. These processes may efficaciously be antagonized by (stem) cell-based strategies at time-points far beyond established therapeutic windows for pharmacological neuroprotection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据