4.2 Article

Dispositional Versus Episode-Specific Assessment of Children's Coping with Pain

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 74-83

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsq058

关键词

chronic and recurrent pain; coping; gastroenterology; pain

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [1 UL1 RR024975] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [P30 HD15052, R01 HD023264, R01 HD23264] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK058404] Funding Source: Medline
  4. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [P30HD015052] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R01HD023264] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  6. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [UL1RR024975] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [P30DK058404] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To evaluate the relation between dispositional and episode-specific pain coping measures, the variability of episode-specific pain coping over time, and the utility of dispositional versus episode-specific measures of pain coping in predicting outcomes in pediatric patients with chronic abdominal pain (CAP). Method Participants (N = 116) completed a clinic interview, a week of daily diary interviews, and 3-month follow-up questionnaires. Daily coping reports were averaged and compared to dispositional coping reports. Coping reports were used to predict depressive symptoms, somatic symptoms, and functional disability at follow-up. Results Dispositional pain coping measures significantly correlated with averaged episode-specific measures. Passive coping predicted higher levels of all outcome variables. The averaged episode-specific passive coping measure was a stronger predictor than a dispositional measure. Measures of active and accommodative coping were not significant predictors. Conclusions Assessment of coping with specific pain episodes may enhance understanding of pain coping.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据