4.7 Article

Endurance training improves fitness and strength in patients with Becker muscular dystrophy

期刊

BRAIN
卷 131, 期 -, 页码 2824-2831

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awn189

关键词

-

资金

  1. Danish Medical Research Council [22-00-1056, 22-03-0474]
  2. Sara and Ludvig Elsass Foundation
  3. University of Copenhagen
  4. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  5. Lundbeck Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies in a dystrophinopathy model (the mdx mouse) suggest that exercise training may be deleterious for muscle integrity, but exercise has never been studied in detail in humans with defects of dystrophin. We studied the effect of endurance training on conditioning in patients with the dystrophinopathy, Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD). Eleven patients with BMD and seven matched, healthy subjects cycled 50, 30 min sessions at 65 of their maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) over 12 weeks, and six patients continued cycling for 1 year. VO2max, muscle biopsies, echocardiography, plasma creatine kinase (CK), lower extremity muscle strength and self-reported questionnaires were evaluated before, after 12 weeks and 1 year of training. Endurance training for 12 weeks, improved VO2max by 47 11 and maximal workload by 80 19 in patients (P 0.005). This was significantly higher than in healthy subjects (16 2 and 17 2). CK levels did not increase with training, and number of central nuclei, necrotic fibres and fibres expressing neonatal myosin heavy chain did not change in muscle biopsies. Strength in muscles involved in cycle exercise (knee extension, and dorsi- and plantar-flexion) increased significantly by 1340. Cardiac pump function, measured by echocardiography, did not change with training. All improvements and safety markers were maintained after 1 year of training. Endurance training is a safe method to increase exercise performance and daily function in patients with BMD. The findings support an active approach to rehabilitation of patients with BMD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据