Knife or needles? A cohort analysis of outcomes after radical prostatectomy or brachytherapy for men with low- or intermediate-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes for men with early stage prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) or brachytherapy (BT) at a single tertiary care center. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively analyzed data from 371 men with clinical T1a-T2c disease with prostate-specific antigen level <20 ng/mL and Gleason score (GS) 6-7 who were treated with RP (n = 279) or BT (n = 92) at MD Anderson Cancer Center in 2000-2001. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) and prostate cancer-specific survival rates were compared by treatment modality. RESULTS: The median followup time was 7.2 and 7.6 years for patients treated with RP and BT, respectively. Disease was upgraded from GS 6 to 7 after central review of the biopsy specimen for 36 men treated with RP (12.9%) and 15 men treated with BT (16.3%). After RP, GS was upgraded in 121 men (43.4%) between the centrally reviewed biopsy and the RP specimen. After RP, 5-year BRFS rates were 96.1% and 90.6% for low- and intermediate-risk disease, respectively (p = 0.003). After BT, 5-year BRFS rates were 92.5% and 95.8% for low- and intermediate-risk disease, respectively (p = 0.017). After RP or BT, 5-year BRFS rates were not significantly different with GS upgraded. Five-year prostate cancer-specific survival rates for patients with upgraded GS were 100% for both RP and BT. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent disease control outcomes can be achieved after either RP or BT as monotherapy for men with early stage prostate cancer. Upgrading of GS from 6 to 7, either (3 + 4) or (4 + 3), did not predict for worse outcomes. (C) 2012 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.