4.2 Article

Dynamics of value propositions: insights from service-dominant logic

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING
卷 45, 期 1-2, 页码 277-294

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LIMITED
DOI: 10.1108/03090561111095702

关键词

Value-in-use pricing; Research

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose - This paper aims to examine the notion of value propositions (promises of reciprocal value between service providers and their customers), value-in-exchange and value-in-use, all within the conceptual context of service-dominant (S-D) logic. Design/methodology/approach - Responding to calls in the recent literature for an academic critique of S-D logic, its key constructs, and its application in marketing situations of varying complexity, the paper presents a conceptual analysis of the determinants of value emphasis in value propositions from the S-D perspective. Findings - Four guiding principles are derived from a rigorous analysis of the relevant literatures. Ways are discussed in which firms might achieve greater flexibility in designing their market offerings, and thus manage different customer segments using different value propositions. The general conclusion is that the ability to communicate a firm's value propositions strategically and effectively is a new area for the development of competence at the core of competitive advantage. Research limitations/implications - The findings pave the way for empirical research into the dynamics of value propositions. Since the main focus of the conceptual framework is on the customer-provider dyad, future studies should broaden coverage to multilateral settings and networked environments. Practical implications - Factors that determine the relative emphasis in value propositions between value-in-exchange and value-in-use are discussed, and the management implications derived from each of the four principles identified. Originality/value - The paper elaborates the application of S-D logic in marketing by investigating the determinants of relative emphasis of value propositions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据