4.2 Article

Toxicity and early treatment outcomes in low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer managed by high-dose-rate brachytherapy as a monotherapy

期刊

BRACHYTHERAPY
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 45-51

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2008.09.004

关键词

HDR-brachytherapy; Monotherapy; Prostate cancer; Urethral dose

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To determine the acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and present short-term biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) rates after high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-B) monotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between October 2003 and June 2006, 36 patients with low (28) and intermediate (8) risk prostate cancer (PCA) were treated by HDR-B monotherapy. All patients received one implant and four fractions of 9.5 Gy within 48 It for a total prescribed dose (PD) of 38 Gy. Five patients received hormonal therapy (HT). Median age was 63.5 years and median followup was 3 years (range, 0.4-4 years). Toxicity was scored according to the CTCAE version 3.0. Biochemical failure was defined according to the Phoenix criteria. RESULTS: Acute and late Grade 3 GU toxicity was observed in 1 (3%) and 4 (11%) patients, respectively. Grade 3 GI toxicity was absent. The three-year bNED survival rate was 100%. The sexual preservation rate in patients without HT was 75%. Late Grade 3 GU toxicity was associated with the planning target volume (PTV) V-100 (% PTV receiving >= 100% of the PD; p = 0.036), D-90 (dose delivered to 90% of the PTV; p = 0.02), and the urethral V-120 (urethral volume receiving >= 120% of the PD: p = 0.043). The urethral V-120 was associated with increased PTV V-100 (p < 0.00 1) and D-90 (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: After HDR-B monotherapy, late Grade 3 GU toxicity is associated with the urethral V-120 and the V-100 and D-90 of the PTV. Decrease of the irradiated urethral volume may reduce the GU toxicity and potentially improve the therapeutic ratio of this treatment. (c) 2009 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据