4.4 Article

Aerodynamic Parameters of Urban Building Arrays with Random Geometries

期刊

BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY
卷 138, 期 1, 页码 99-120

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10546-010-9551-7

关键词

Displacement height; Drag coefficient; Roughness length; Urban building arrays; Wind-tunnel experiments

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan [19360260]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19360260] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is difficult to describe the flow characteristics within and above urban canopies using only geometrical parameters such as plan area index (lambda (p)) and frontal area index (lambda (f)) because urban surfaces comprise buildings with random layouts, shapes, and heights. Furthermore, two types of 'randomness' are associated with the geometry of building arrays: the randomness of element heights (vertical) and that of the rotation angles of each block (horizontal). In this study, wind-tunnel experiments were conducted on seven types of urban building arrays with various roughness packing densities to measure the bulk drag coefficient (C(d)) and mean wind profile; aerodynamic parameters such as roughness length (z(o)) and displacement height (d) were also estimated. The results are compared with previous results from regular arrays having neither 'vertical' nor 'horizontal' randomness. In vertical random arrays, the plot of C(d) and z(o) versus lambda (f) exhibited a monotonic increase, and zo increased by a factor of almost two for lambda (f) = 48-70%. C(d) was strongly influenced by the standard deviation of the height of blocks (sigma) when lambda (p) >= 17%, whereas C(d) was independent of sigma when lambda (p) = 7%. In the case of horizontal random arrays, the plot of the estimated C(d) against lambda (f) showed a peak. The effect of both vertical and horizontal randomness of the layout on aerodynamic parameters can be explained by the structure of the vortices around the blocks; the aspect ratio of the block is an appropriate index for the estimation of such features.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据